Conversation and representation.
    We represent ourselves by not only what we say but the way and formality in which we deliver it, meaning that you can infer characteristics based on this. For example, someone who has long periods of airtime in a conversation can be seen as a “confident” individual.   However, when you look at the amount of hedges, indirect commands and minor sentences such as “um and erm” they produced immediately change the way they are represented and received. Their persona goes from confident to doubtful and uncertain. Pin pointing a particular “way” in which you speak, is difficult because when you are asked this we automatically begin to change our natural speech.   This results in using “demand characteristics”, which is where we change our behaviour and speech to fit in with the way we think we should behave. This gives us a false indication of the way in which someone is represented because it lacks reality.    Schegloff’s conversation model, suggest that “conversations are like ...