Controversial issue- American gun control (Fake blogs and characters).
50
year old Jonathon Smith from Houston, Texas. Wrote a blog following the tragic
shootings in Oregon, He says that congressional policies on guns should
remain the same. His blog below states why he feels that the laws on armament
should remain as they have for centuries.
"Every
year we hear that some 'maniac'
has been let loose with a weapon of some sort that has ended in lives being
lost, when we hear this on the news, in the newspaper or on the radio, it’s
very black and white. You’re only told what they want you to hear, which is
similar to everything in life. Has anyone ever thought to ask about the
shooters back ground? Mental illnesses? What if there was a reason as to why
these crimes were being committed? It’s not the laws on guns that need to be
amended, it’s the system that allows these people to obtain them that needs to
be dealt with. These people are crazy; the US government are naïve every
time it happens. Breaking down the ability to obtain a weapon will
not only anger people, destroy the valuable history. Guns are an
important part of American history and if taken away will
damage not only the economy that buying and collecting weaponry
will destroy ancient heritage of our nation. How can people even consider
loosing this? The fact is that when these people have no access to guns, there
will be no problem. Then we will have less people questioning our
authority."
25
year old Richard Barker an Oxford university graduate who has a degree in
Psychology, from London wrote a blog following the tragic events of the Oregon
shootings. He chose to write his blog after reading Jonathon's post beforehand,
he is infuriated and wants to set the record straight.
"Every
year, smeared across my television screen is horrific public places, schools
and recently a college in complete despair after a ‘maniac’ has open fired
on handfuls of innocent people. The media hype always seems to blame mental
illness as a scape goat for the situation, because that's the most obvious
answer to people. An easy way to make sense as to why a stranger would open
fire on a bunch of strangers, it provides us with the comfort that this was a
'one off'. It’s soon forgotten, and the world is shocked when it happens over
and over again. There are more shootings in the US than in any other country in
the world, and with the picture of Oregon community college slowly slipping out
of our minds; America shows no signs of abolishing gun laws. Firstly I think it’s
important to make sure that everyone knows the facts about the connection between mental
illness and mass shootings. In 2001, Dr. Jeffrey Swanson conducted a study on
34 adolescent mass murders that were all male, the study revealed a surprising
outcome. This was that;
-
70% were described as loners
-
61.5% were substance abusers
-
48% had preoccupations with weapons
-
43.5% were victims of bullying
-23%
had undergone a psychiatric test, and had been diagnosed as well as having a
history with mental health
This
means that just over 1 of 5 did not have any mental health
issue. The statistics shows that there were more murderers who shared
an issue of violence/abuse rather than a mental health issue. Dr.
Swans on also suggested that "Even if we had a perfect mental
health care system, which is not going to solve our gun violence problem. If we
were able to magically cure schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression
that would be wonderful, but overall violence would go down by only about 4
percent". The majority of mass shooting are not made by someone who has
shown indicators of mental health issues, but people who have shown a great
deal of 'violent' behaviour. It’s clear that there needs to be intensive back
ground checks on those who wish to purchase a gun, but will this really solve
the problem?

Really
useful interview with a Psychologist who takes about the connections
between mental health and mass shooting. With statistics etc.
Good contrasting pieces, although you could work the American vs English expressions a bit more and maybe give a sense of their own experiences coming though. I like the use of research and the description by the blogger of it as "facts" in bold - that is the kind of aspect you should focus in in your commentary.
ReplyDelete